Latest Coverage
Find the latest stories, research, and insights on policies, programs, and ideas shaping the national conversation on poverty and economic mobility.
Subscribe to our newsletter for daily insights
Spotlight on Poverty and Opportunity leads research and consulting initiatives that identify and address barriers to economic well-being.
Type
State
Issue
The News & Observer, July 22, 2011: 'No Child Left Behind' testing flunks 141 of 163 Wake schools
"Schools that receive federal Title I funding for low-income children and fail to meet adequate yearly progress standards for two years in a row face a variety of sanctions, including having to offer tutoring services, giving students a chance to leave for a better school and restructuring a school."
The Boston Globe, July 22, 2011: Uncertainties over US aid vex students
"Pell Grants, which provide a maximum of $5,550 and aim to help low-income families, cover just one-third of tuition on average. They are nonetheless the cornerstone of federal financial aid and enable many students to attend college who lack the means otherwise."
The Detroit News, July 21, 2011: Low-income seniors get boost with food aid signup
"The Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, or RSVP, of Macomb and Elder Law of Michigan have launched an effort to help adults 60 and older with low incomes get state food benefits. The groups rolled out the program last week."
Chattanooga Times Free Press, July 21, 2011: (Op-Ed) Pell Grants should be saved
"It is increasingly clear that one of the possible casualties of the nation's rancorous debt-ceiling debate is the Pell Grant program. The grants, which have helped millions of low-income and moderate-income students attend college over the last few decades, would be reduced significantly if the most strident of Republican budget-cutters have their way."
St. Petersburg Times, July 21, 2011: More in line for school transfers
"A similar program is in place. Under the No Child Left Behind law, districts are required to offer public school options to parents in high-poverty schools that repeatedly fail to meet federal standards. Generally speaking, few parents exercise that option."
The New York Times, July 20, 2011: (Blog) Why Hasn't Employment of the Elderly Fallen?
"While employment rates have fallen sharply among the general population, they have not done so among the elderly."
Minnesota Public Radio, July 20, 2011: Bill cuts funding for higher education by 10%
"In the next two years the University of Minnesota and the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system will each receive a little over a billion dollars in state aid, 10 percent less than they received in the previous two years."
The Boston Globe, July 20, 2011: Myths of school discipline challenged
"The research showed that while some high-poverty schools suspended students at unexpectedly high rates, others with strikingly similar characteristics did not. The same discipline gap was clear for prosperous, suburban schools and small, rural schools: Some were harsh and others with nearly identical qualities were not."
Detroite Free Press, July 20, 2011: Poverty study: 1 in 3 Michigan senior citizens struggles with money
"A third of Michigan's seniors are considered 'economically insecure' far more than the federal poverty limits would suggest, according to a new study."
The Washington Post, July 20, 2011: Improving school meals a priority
"And in the District, the 2010 D.C. Healthy Schools Act set strict standards for fat and sodium content and requires that 20 percent of produce come from the Mid-Atlantic region. In the high-poverty district, all schools must offer universal free breakfast."
The Cincinnati Enquirer, July 20, 2011: Ky. tries for grant to boost preschool programs
"Gross said Kentucky's current early-childhood program serves 23,000 students, including low-income 4-year-olds, and 3- and 4-year-olds who have developmental delays or disabilities regardless of family income."
The New York Times, July 20, 2011: Hurting Poor Students
"The State and Local Funding Flexibility Act would let school districts spend money earmarked for impoverished children on almost any educational purpose they chose. This would inevitably lead to money going from politically powerless poor schools to those without the same needs."
